Home News Map Archaeoastronomy Maritime Linguistics Inscriptions Mundo Maya Bioanthro Anatolia Upload Conferences
LuwianSiteAtlas · Aşınmaz, Mutlu & Zangger 2025

483 Bronze Age
Settlements

The complete LuwianSiteAtlas — every Middle and Late Bronze Age settlement site (2000–1200 BCE) larger than 100m diameter in western Anatolia, compiled over a decade and published in Nature Scientific Data Dec 2025. Linked to Pleiades, Wikidata, iDAI.gazetteer, and ancient ore deposits.

483
Settlement sites
800yr
Record span (2000–1200 BCE)
250K km²
Survey area
CC BY-NC 4.0
Open license
Data: Luwian Studies Foundation, Zurich · Nature Sci. Data 12, 1804 (2025) · Zenodo · LuwianSiteMap ↗
🗺 Site Map
📋 Site Browser
📖 Research Context
🏛 Hittite Monuments
🔤 Anatolian Scripts
sites visible
Filters
Search name / toponym
Chronological period
All Middle BA Late BA MBA+LBA
Province (il)
External links
Ore deposits
◆ markers show ancient mineral resource deposits (copper, tin, iron, gold) linked to site proximity.
Loading LuwianSiteAtlas from Zenodo…
Site Catalogue
All 483 Settlements
Loading…
Research Background
Western Anatolia's Missing Chapter

When Arthur Evans defined the cultures of the Aegean Bronze Age at Knossos in the 1920s, he drew the boundary at the European shore. Troy and its vast Anatolian hinterland were left outside the canonical frame — a political and disciplinary exclusion that shaped Western archaeology for a century. The region between Mycenaean Greece and the Hittite heartland was treated, in Evans's wake, as a cultural void.

The LuwianSiteAtlas dismantles that framing with data. Compiled over more than a decade by archaeologist Serdal Mutlu, geoarchaeologist Eberhard Zangger, and geospatial scientist Alper Aşınmaz, it documents 483 major settlement sites — each at least 100 metres in diameter — across the western third of modern Türkiye. Many were inhabited continuously for 5,000 years. The settlement density matches Mycenaean Greece, Hittite Anatolia, and Minoan Crete combined. The Luwian territory, at roughly 250,000 km², was larger than all three.

Published in Nature Scientific Data in December 2025 (vol. 12, article 1804), the dataset is the first interoperable, georeferenced catalogue of its kind for this region. Each entry is linked to Pleiades, Wikidata, iDAI.gazetteer, Nomisma, Arachne, and GeoNames — enabling machine-readable cross-queries across the global archaeological Linked Data ecosystem.

483
Settlement sites ≥100m diam.
10+ yr
Compilation span (2014–2025)
250K km²
Survey territory
30 + 33
Excavations + surveys synthesized
5,000 yr
Longest site occupation spans
6
Linked external databases

The Luwians
Who Were They?

The Luwians were an Indo-European-speaking people occupying western and southern Anatolia throughout the Bronze Age. They spoke Luwian — a language closely related to Hittite — and used both cuneiform script (for administrative texts) and their own Anatolian hieroglyphic system (for monumental inscriptions), the latter in continuous use for over 1,000 years.

They are named in Hittite texts as the inhabitants of the western Anatolian kingdoms: Arzawa, Mira, Wilusa (likely ancient Troy's kingdom), the Seha River Land, and the Lukka Lands. The Hittite Great King corresponded with Luwian rulers; the Tawagalawa Letter records diplomatic friction over a renegade Luwian commander. Egyptian texts from the reign of Ramesses III name the Sea Peoples — whose catastrophic raids ended the Bronze Age palatial systems — using ethnonyms now identified with Anatolian Luwian groups.

The Luwian hieroglyphic script was replaced by the Phoenician-derived alphabet around 700 BCE. Luwian cultural continuity persisted into the 6th century BCE, when it was absorbed by the Persian Empire.

Ore deposits and economic geography: The dataset includes proximity data for ancient copper, tin, iron, and gold deposits across western Anatolia. Each settlement's relationship to mineral resources is encoded — a crucial key to understanding the trade networks that made this region an economic engine of the Late Bronze Age world system.

Dataset Architecture
Interoperable by Design

The Zenodo release (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17128262) is structured as relational tables in both CSV and JSON formats. Core files include site_descriptions (prose accounts of each settlement), site_period (Middle BA / Late BA / both attributions), site_categories (function: tell, mound, fortified settlement, coastal harbour, etc.), and separate crosswalk tables to each external authority file — Pleiades, Wikidata, iDAI.gazetteer (DAI), Nomisma, Arachne, and GeoNames.

The three enrichment scripts uploaded here — wikidata_api.py, pleiades_api.py, and geonames.py — are the actual production code used by the Luwian Studies team to build those crosswalks. They perform geospatial nearest-neighbour queries within a 5km radius against each external gazetteer, then resolve the closest match by geodesic distance. They are included in the Zenodo repository under CC BY-NC 4.0.

Aşınmaz, A., Mutlu, S. & Zangger, E. "An interoperable catalogue of Middle and Late Bronze Age settlements in western Anatolia (c. 2000–1200 BCE)." Scientific Data 12, 1804 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06241-9

Dataset: LuwianSiteAtlas: A Spatial and Semantic Dataset of Bronze Age Settlements in Western Anatolia. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17128262 (2025).

Asia Minor — Bronze Age & Iron Age
Hittite & Neo-Hittite Monuments

The Hittite Empire (c. 1650–1200 BCE) was the dominant political force of Bronze Age Anatolia, controlling territory from the Aegean coast to northern Syria. Their monumental record — rock reliefs, hieroglyphic inscriptions, temples, and fortified citadels — spans a wide geographic arc that overlaps substantially with the Luwian settlement zone documented in the LuwianSiteAtlas. Luwian hieroglyphic was in fact the script of Hittite royal monuments, making these two corpora inseparable at the source.

The Neo-Hittite period (1200–650 BCE) follows the Bronze Age collapse and sees the continuation of Luwian-language political entities — the so-called Syro-Hittite kingdoms of southeastern Anatolia and northern Syria — which preserved Hittite monumental traditions for another five centuries. Sites like Karatepe, Zincirli, Karkamış, and Tell Tayinat are among the richest archaeological contexts in the ancient Near East.

Hittite Monuments (hittitemonuments.com), compiled and maintained by Tayfun Bilgin, is the most comprehensive digital reference for this corpus — covering rock monuments, reliefs, and inscribed objects at their find spots, with photography and site-by-site documentation for both periods.

Interactive Reference
hittitemonuments.com
EXTERNAL RESOURCE · Tayfun Bilgin · CC BY-NC Open in new tab ↗
Empire Period (1400–1200 BCE) and Neo-Hittite Period (1200–650 BCE). If the frame is blocked, use the open-in-new-tab link. Citation: Tayfun Bilgin, www.hittitemonuments.com.
Writing Systems of Ancient Asia Minor
Anatolian Scripts

A growing reference to the scripts used across ancient Anatolia and its neighbours — the syllabaries, hieroglyphs, and alphabets in which the region's languages were recorded. Each entry pairs transliteration with signs and keeps the source's own caveats visible rather than smoothing them away. First up: the cuneiform used for Hittite, the earliest attested Indo-European language.

𒀭 Hittite Cuneiform
2nd millennium BCE · Boğazköy / Ḫattuša archives
Hittite Cuneiform

Hittite was written in cuneiform on clay tablets across roughly the 17th–12th centuries BCE, in an orthography adapted from Old Babylonian practice — most likely transmitted through Syro-Babylonian scribes into Asia Minor. The syllabary combines the consonants b, p, d, t, g, k, ḫ, r, l, m, n, š, z with the vowels a, e, i, u, in the shapes V, CV, VC and CVC, plus added ya, wa and wi signs. Notably it drops the Akkadian s-series, and the voiced/voiceless pairs (k/g, p/b, t/d) are used somewhat interchangeably, so the underlying phonology remains debated.

Signs served three functions: syllabograms (italic lowercase, spelling Hittite words), Akkadograms (italic uppercase, borrowed Akkadian spellings), and Sumerograms (regular uppercase, logograms and determinatives). The parenthetical values below — e.g. (=DAM "wife") — record a sign's logographic reading alongside its syllabic one.

Provenance note. The tables below reproduce the sign inventory as presented on Wikipedia, which sets it out in Old Akkadian / Old Babylonian sign forms — so most glyphs shown are not the exact shapes found in Hittite tablets. The Unicode cuneiform will also render in whatever generic cuneiform font your device provides, which is inaccurate for Hittite; a specialised Hittite font is needed for faithful shapes. For actual Hittite forms see Lauffenburger's Hittite Grammar Homepage and Luraghi & Inglese (2020), Glottothèque.
Single vowels
V
V · single vowels
a𒀀e𒂊i𒄿u𒌋ú𒌑
Consonant + vowel
CV
CV · consonant + vowel
b-p-d-t-g-k-ḫ-l-m-n-r-š-w-y-z-
-aba𒁀pa𒉺da𒁕ta𒋫ga𒂵ka𒅗ḫa𒄩la𒆷ma𒈠na𒈾ra𒊏ša𒊭wa𒉿ya𒅀za𒍝
-ebe𒁁pé, pí𒁉de, di𒁲te𒋼ge, gi𒄀ke, ki𒆠ḫe𒄭ḫé𒃶le, li𒇷me𒈨𒈪ne𒉈𒉌re, ri𒊑še𒊺ze𒍣𒍢
-ibi𒁉ti𒋾ḫi𒄭mi𒈪ni𒉌ši𒅆wi₅𒃾zi𒍣
-ubu, pu𒁍du𒁺tu𒌅gu𒄖ku𒆪ḫu𒄷lu𒇻mu𒈬nu𒉡ru𒊒šu𒋗šú𒋙zu𒍪
Vowel + consonant
VC
VC · vowel + consonant
-b-p-d-t-g-k-ḫ-l-m-n-r-z
a-ab, ap𒀊ad, at𒀜ag, ak𒀝aḫ, eḫ, iḫ, uḫ𒄴al𒀠am𒄠an𒀭ar𒅈𒀸az𒊍
e-eb, ep, ib, ip𒅁ed, et, id, it𒀉eg, ek, ig, ik𒅅el𒂖em, im𒅎en𒂗er, ir𒅕𒌍𒐁ez, iz𒄑
i-il𒅋in𒅔𒅖
u-ub, up𒌒ud, ut𒌓ug, uk𒊌ul𒌌um𒌝un𒌦ur𒌨úr𒌫𒍑uz𒊻
Consonant + vowel + consonant
CVC
CVC · consonant + vowel + consonant
-b/-p-d/-t-g/-k-ḫ-l-m-n-r-z
b-/p--a-pád/t, píd/t𒁁p/bal𒁄pár/bar𒈦(=maš)paš
-i-p/bíl𒉋(=GIBIL "new")pirp/biš, pùš𒄫(=gir)
-u-p/bur
d-/t--a-tab/p, dáb/p𒋰(=TAB "2")tág/k, dag/k𒁖t/daḫ, túḫ𒈭t/dal𒊑(=ri)tám/dam𒁮(=DAM "wife")t/dan𒆗(=kal)tar𒋻t/dáš, t/diš𒁹("1")tàš𒀾
-e-/-i-t/dim𒁴tin/tén𒁷dir(=DIR "red")tir/ter𒌁(=TIR "forest")tíš
-u-t/dub/p𒁾(=DUB "clay tablet")t/daḫ, túḫ𒈭túl𒇥t/dum𒌈túr/dur𒄙(=DUR "strip")
g-/k--a-kab/p, gáb/p𒆏(=KAB "left")k/gad/t𒃰(=GAD "linen")gal𒃲(=GAL "great")kal, gal₉𒆗kal𒆗(=KAL "strong")kam/gám𒄰(=TU₇ "soup")k/gán𒃷(=GÁN "field")kar(=KAR "find")k/gàr𒃼k/gaš𒁉(=bi, KAŠ "beer")gaz𒄤(=GAZ "kill")
-i-kib/pkid/t₉𒃰(=gad)k/gir𒄫kiš𒆧(=KIŠ "world")
-u-kul𒆰(=KUL "offspring")kúl, gul𒄢(=GUL "break")k/gum𒄣kur𒆳(=KUR "land")kùr/gur𒄥
ḫ--a-ḫab/p𒆸ḫad/t𒉺(=pa, PA "sceptre")ḫal𒄬ḫar/ḫur𒄯(ḪAR "ring", ḪUR "thick", MUR "lung")ḫaš𒋻
-u-ḫub/p𒄽ḫul(=ḪUL "evil")
l--a-lal𒇲(=LAL "bind")lam𒇴
-i-lig/k𒌨(=ur)liš𒇺(=LIŠ "spoon")
-u-luḫ𒈛(=LUḪ "minister")lum𒈝
m--a-maḫ𒈤(=MAḪ "great")man(=MAN "20")mar𒈥maš𒈦(=MAŠ "half")
-e-/-i-mil/mel𒅖(=iš)meš(="90")miš𒈩
-u-mut(=MUD "blood")mur𒄯(=ḫur)
n--a-nab/p𒀮nam𒉆(=NAM "district")
-i-nir𒉪niš(=man)
r--a-rad/t𒋥
-i-riš𒊕(=šag)
š--a-šab/pšag/k𒊕(=SAG "head")šaḫ𒋚(=ŠUBUR "pig")šal𒊩(=MUNUS "woman")šam𒌑(=ú)šàmšar𒊬(=SAR "plant")
-i-šìpšir𒋓(=ŠIR "testicles")
-u-šum𒋳šur𒋩
z--u-zul𒂄zum𒍮
Reading the CVC chart: row = initial consonant + vowel; column = final consonant. A sign spanning two rows or two columns is one cuneiform sign covering both readings (e.g. ḫar/ḫur, pád/píd). Cells with transliteration but no glyph have no Unicode sign supplied in the source.